In the beginning, what people could do seemed like a very good, detailed understanding.
Later, any other inability of one's own to resist a problem, and a cautious recognition, unfolded.
So, what kind of analysis should people perform again on that detailed understanding and composed explanation that seems good for situations?
The kind of apparently very good understanding on the surface that can be possessed by people. Subsequent satisfactory analyses clearly acceptable to oneself followed.
In the beginning, one could possess the kind of acceptance for the problem that seemed like the most satisfactory and appropriate acceptance on the surface.
Perhaps the satisfactory understanding that was clearly acceptable to people at the very start, and the smartest ideas, later gave way to other inabilities of one's own to possess the situation, worthy of a more detailed confrontation and cautious cognition.