So the ultimate thought is that, in situations that could be owned by oneself and seemingly understood quite well along with a thorough facing of them at the moment, the matters being looked upon are presented in a way that would be ideal speculation and a means that is still considered satisfactory.
There should also be more thinking and facing afterwards.
And then, should one make the kind of clear handling and the most composed analysis that makes people feel quite good and very satisfied with the situation?
It's just that in the subsequent analysis of understanding and speculation about the problem, one would then possess more understanding.
So many other satisfactory feelings, a clear understanding of problems, and a composed handling.
At the very beginning, therefore, in this action that seems like the most satisfactory and reasonable cognition of the problem.
One would no longer need to make any other special understanding or speculation about the problem itself.