But Violet overestimated her ability to predict that guy's character.
Some people always possess a kind of unwavering cognition in their understanding of the world.
They believe that unless the other party initiates change toward what is seen before them, there is of course no need for themselves to make any necessary ideal response to the problem at hand.
And even if the other party does acknowledge the issue and undergoes the change as one perceives, this doesn't necessarily mean that the final understanding and guesses of the matter will align with a common understanding and cognition of the problem.
At that time, he can still prepare and approach the issue with his own understanding and thoughts about the potential outcomes of the problem.
Therefore, it's at this point that one delves into those seemingly satisfactory and detailed cognitions of the issue.
What kind of seemingly decent and fitting understanding and satisfactory cognition would one then make of the problem?