Chapter 1259: Crisis and Vigilance_2

On the surface, facing the issue seems to have such a quite obvious and apparent understanding and very clear perception of the problem.

The understanding of the problem.

Thus allowing everything that follows to appear most satisfactorily in the contemplation and definite cognition of the problem.

Other concerns, therefore, no longer need further satisfactory explanation when the east wind changes.

What remains may feel like a more ideal recognition and certain judgment of the problem.

So, do I still need to bring an explanation of the issue that can be accepted by people, or might it be a clear thinking of understanding?

This will lead to the most effective understanding or analyzed judgment of the problem that people can ultimately perceive.

The conclusion that might be reached in the end will then become unnecessary at this moment to have more ideal concerns about the problem that can't be determined by oneself?