passive resistance of mine, this clinging to an individual conviction,
was the best moral training I received at Rockford College. During the
first decade of Hull- House, it was felt by propagandists of divers social
theories that the new Settlement would be a fine coign of vantage from
which to propagate social faiths, and that a mere preliminary step
would be the conversion of the founders; hence I have been reasoned
with hours at a time, and I recall at least three occasions when this was
followed by actual prayer. In the first instance, the honest exhorter
who fell upon his knees before my astonished eyes, was an advocate of
single tax upon land values. He begged, in that indirect phraseology
which is deemed appropriate for prayer, that "the sister might see the
beneficent results it would bring to the poor who live in the awful congested districts around this very house.''
The early socialists used every method of attack, —a favorite one
being the statement, doubtless sometimes honestly made, that I really
was a socialist, hut "too much of a coward to say so.'' I remember one
socialist who habitually opened a very telling address he was in the
habit of giving upon the street corners, by holding me up as an awful
example to his fellow-socialists, as one of their number "who had been
caught in the toils of capitalism.'' He always added as a final clinching
of the statement, that he knew what he was talking about because he
was a member of the Hull-House Men's Club. When I ventured to say
to him that not all of the thousands of people who belong to a class or
club at Hull-House could possibly know my personal opinions, and to
mildly inquire upon what he founded his assertions, he triumphantly
replied that I had once admitted to him that I had read Sombart and *Loria, and that any one of sound mind must see the inevitable conclusions of such master reasonings.
I could multiply these two instances a hundred-fold, and possibly
nothing aided me to stand on my own feet and to select what seemed
reasonable from this wilderness of dogma, so much as my early encounter with genuine zeal and affectionate solicitude, associated with what
I could not accept as the whole truth.
I do not wish to take callow writing too seriously, hut I reproduce
from an oratorical contest the following hit of premature pragmatism,
doubtless due much more to temperament than to perception, because
I am still ready to subscribe to it, although the grandiloquent style is, I hope, a thing of the past: "Those who believe that Justice is hut a poet