fact that they are all human voices lifted hy a high motive. This is
a weak illustration of what a Settlement attempts to do. It aims,
in a measure, to develop whatever of social life its neighborhood
may afford, to focus and give form to that life, to bring to bear
upon it the results of cultivation and training; but it receives in
exchange for the music of isolated voices the volume and strength
of the chorus. It is quite impossible for me to say in what proportion or degree the subjective necessity which led to the opening
of Hull-House combined the three trends: first, the desire to interpret democracy in social terms; secondly, the impulse heating
at the very source of our lives, urging us to aid in the race
progress; and, thirdly, the Christian movement toward humanitarianism. It is difficult to analyze a living thing; the analysis is at
best imperfect. Many more motives may blend with the three
trends; possibly the desire for a new form of social success due to
the nicety of imagination, which refuses worldly pleasures unmixed with the joys of self-sacrifice; possibly a love of approbation, so vast that it is not content with the treble clapping of
delicate hands, hut wishes also to hear the bass notes from toughened palms, may mingle with these.
The Settlement, then, is an experimental effort to aid in the
solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city. It insists
that these problems are not confined to any one portion of a city.
It is an attempt to relieve, at the same time, the overaccumulation at one end of society and the destitution at the other; hut it
assumes that this overaccumulation and destitution is most sorely
felt in the things that pertain to social and educational advantages. From its very nature it can stand for no political or social
propaganda. It must, in a sense, give the warm welcome of an inn
to all such propaganda, if perchance one of them be found an
angel. The one thing to be dreaded in the Settlement is that it
lose its flexibility, its power of quick adaptation, its readiness to
change its methods as its environment may demand. It must be
open to conviction and must have a deep and abiding sense of
tolerance. It must he hospitable and ready for experiment. It
should demand from its residents a scientific patience in the accumulation of facts and the steady holding of their sympathies as
one of the best instruments for that accumulation. It must he
grounded in a philosophy whose foundation is on the solidarity of
the human race, a philosophy which will not waver when the