1. Over Lap (오버랩)
This technique refers to when one scene overlaps with another. The previous scene gradually fades away. It is often confused with the dissolve technique and, in acting, refers to the moment when an actor cuts off the previous line and transitions directly into the next one.
2. Fade Out (페이드아웃)
A common technique in theatre or film, where the lighting dims, signaling the end of a scene or transition to a new one. This moment can also serve as a chance to skip intermediate processes or rearrange the stage setup. As the stage darkens, the image transmitted to the audience halts, creating an effect of temporarily breaking the narrative.
***
I stared at the scar clearly left on my right wrist. The words echoed in my mind, repeating as if they were bouncing back. Thoughts crossed my mind, and slowly, I began to piece together a conclusion.
A wound I don't remember. And then a fade-out.
'Does this mean there's a point where my memory cuts off?'
The last time I checked my arm was just before noon today. After feeding Leonardo, I went to the fountain to wash my hands, rolling my sleeves up to my elbows.
Until then, there had been no scratches or blemishes on my body. So, the wound must have happened sometime between then and the afternoon.
I took out the dagger, which I suspected to be the tool that caused the wound, and checked its blade. There were no traces of blood or greasy smudges. It was in the same condition as it had been when I first got it.
When I held the tip of the blade against the wound to compare, the width of the blade roughly matched the size of the gash. So, it's highly likely that the tool used was indeed the dagger. If it had been something like a shard of glass or some sharp object lying around, the surface would have been rougher.
This time, I set the dagger aside and turned my sleeve inside out. There were no bloodstains on it. Even though the sleeve was loose, a few drops should have stained it when it brushed against the wound, but there were no signs of red at all.
Despite the stiff fabric that tends to crease easily, there were no small wrinkles or rough tears in the cloth that might have formed when the wound was made.
I didn't suddenly go mad and cut my arm for no reason. I don't like pain, and unless there's a good reason, I wouldn't hurt myself.
Without having the chance to look for paper, I must have been desperate… or perhaps I judged that leaving traces on objects would be pointless.
Or maybe both reasons are true.
The absence of traces on the dagger and my sleeve bothered me. It was as if everything except my body had been erased. As though everything had been replaced with new things.
'…Overlap.'
The term for when one scene overlaps with another. Why would I leave this as a clue? I mulled over the fact that the wound carved into my body remained, but the memories and objects had reverted.
'Could it be that while I was in the
If time had been reversed, the past record of me leaving the wound should also have been erased, leaving only clean skin. The absence of memory or objects can be explained, but the wound itself can't be.
While I was agonizing over this, my gaze subtly shifted.
The slashes drawn in the middle. Perhaps they were just left as markers to differentiate words, making it easier to identify the clue, but wasn't there also a reason why the long, painful slash was made instead of a quick, short dot?
If interpreted theatrically… those slashes might represent "beat" division. It was a notation frequently used when analyzing scripts.
Even within a single scene, when a character's thoughts or actions shift, the tempo of the performance is adjusted by dividing the beats like this.
For example:
So, how about interpreting it as if reading a play?
Let's try to expand on
Now, if I bring this back to my own position, living in this world within the play…
This would mean that another scenario was added on top of the current one, and in the process, my memory was washed clean. Immediately after, the world went dark. Could this be the meaning?
The props were replaced with new ones, but my body wasn't replaced—only my memories were wiped. So it's more like a re-shoot. In other words, an 1NG cut occurred, and the scene was filmed again.
Props can always be swapped out, but there's no spare for the actor's body. If only my memory was cleaned, it makes sense. This may be a patchwork deduction, but it's the only thing that comes to mind right now.
A sense of discomfort began to creep up from my feet. Ever since realizing that some unidentified force had been playing with my self-awareness, I couldn't feel anything pleasant.
Before I saw the wound, I had no reason to doubt—it had been such a flawless scheme that it even frightened me.
Still, I had to remain calm.
After all, the me before my memory was wiped left a clue. The entire process couldn't have been completed in just one second. Even in a crisis, there must have been a brief moment of leisure, which allowed me to leave behind something like this.
'Don't panic. Think. There must be a reason for the re-shoot.'
In terms of plot, something must have been found wrong, so the film was likely rewound. But why would the scene need to be retaken? Was it an actor's mistake? Or a critical error in the script?
What scene could have had a mistake or flaw?
It wasn't like I had been following the guidelines of the script during the performance; this happened spontaneously, in the moment.
Could it be that?
Has anyone recognized the discrepancies in the world of the play?
No matter what rules govern the structure of the script, it has been warning from the very first scene on stage: don't let the characters recognize the discrepancies in the world of the play.
If they do, who knows what consequences might follow, but the aftermath will definitely not be light.
But does that even make sense? From noon onward, Leonardo and Vittorio had been acting together.
Unlike me, an outsider to the stage, they were characters belonging to the world of the play, so it felt unnatural for them to suddenly become aware of the discord and for that to become a problem. There seemed to be no trigger for it.
'So, could there be another reason?'
I started mentally listing everything that had happened since noon today, trying to find a possible edit point.
We went to the church, looked around the sacristy, met Orlie and talked about the scriptures, gathered some information, and then Leonardo clumsily ran over and interrupted, cutting the information-gathering short. On the way back, we stopped by the clock tower and then went straight to the inn.
Just as I was deep in thought, something caught my attention in the wound on my wrist.
First, a small dot appeared on top of the wound. I had thought it was a droplet of blood, but the tip of the blade had actually poked it. It wasn't a large, noticeable cut, but rather something that had gone unnoticed until now.
<Ò.L/F.O>
'This is an emphasis mark, isn't it?'
…Now that I think about it, both O.L and F.O use the letter "O." I must have used a script term to carve out a clue that I would recognize in such an urgent situation.
In fact, if I had wanted to convey the idea of a re-shoot or something being out of order, I could have easily used NG or RE instead. Those are more intuitive and easier to interpret than "overlap."
The emphasis on the dot above… does it symbolize something? Maybe a name or a place?
The only locations I know are Sinistra and Rilke. Neither of these is related to the letter "O."
Then, could it be a person's name?
Names with an "O" in them would include Leonardo and Vittorio. But this doesn't seem to have much significance. Moreover, why leave the mark only on the "O.L" and not on the "F.O"? Was it simply because there wasn't enough time?
'If I left a clue, I should also be able to guess it like I would.'
I can't even fully understand myself, so it could just be speculation. But in this situation, isn't it better to do what I can?
If, in a rush, I wanted to point something out about Leonardo, what would I have done?
If I wanted to emphasize Leo, I would have left the mark above the "L" in "O.L."
On the other hand, if I had meant to refer to Vittorio, I would have marked
Perhaps, it could be referring to a name that starts with "O."
The reason for leaving an emphasis mark on the first "O"…
'…Orlie?'
Knock.
The sudden sound of knocking startled me, and I snapped back to reality. It seemed Leonardo had finished changing. I had taken a bit longer than expected. I quickly pulled my sleeve down to cover the wound and changed into my black attire.
After hastily finishing my change, still slightly breathless, I opened the door, and Leonardo looked at me with a questioning expression, tilting his head.
My heart was still pounding, and my hands and feet tingled, but thanks to the mask that covered my lower face, I only had to pay attention to my eyes when facing Leonardo.
"You're ready already?"
"Yeah. I figured it would take a while, so I came to check. Did something happen?"
Did something happen?
Well, something did happen. It seems like the stage has been reset without us realizing it. Orlie, whether he's a rogue or a knight, is driving me crazy with his suspicious behaviour.
I could have explained everything in detail, but of course, I chose to brush it off.
"Nothing happened."
In this world, I had to do just that.