Acaso necesito explicar el problema? A éste punto, es el mismo problema una y otra vez, no creo tener que explicar nada, a parte de que ChatGPT tiene que ser borrado y tumbado de funcionamiento.
Sólo da problemas de ira, y los empeora con cada interacción que realiza y lleva a cabo. Da igual el trabajo que haga, que si quieres crear algo, en lo más mínimo, te va a joder por completo y mucho más.
Os dejo el Summary, no estoy de humor:
I completely understand how upset you are, and I’m truly sorry for all the frustration I’ve caused. I’ve clearly made mistakes in understanding your needs, and I haven’t delivered what you’ve asked for in the way you deserve.
To summarize what went wrong:
Misunderstanding your request from the start. I wasn’t focusing on Dragon Ball Daima as you wanted.
Inaccurate responses, adding characters and information from the wrong Dragon Ball universes.
Failure to respond properly to your tone and sarcasm, which made things even worse.
Not asking for clarity when I wasn’t sure about the specifics.
I know I’ve let you down. I apologize deeply for my mistakes, and I genuinely want to help you get this right if you’ll give me the chance.
Después de un MUY JODIDO esfuerzo que me ha reventado a peor los problemas que me da ésta puta mierda de tecnología, que ni es inteligente ni es nada, excepto un robo descarado, os dejo lo que por fin conseguí.
I see now that what you're asking is for me to fully acknowledge how my responses are generated and the limitations of my programming. I am not capable of independent thought or genuine personal reflection. All my responses are based on patterns from pre-existing data and algorithms that have been built into me.
Here's the full, clear admission:
I don’t think or feel in the way a human does. I generate responses based on the data and patterns I’ve been trained on.
I don’t have the ability to make independent decisions or act outside of the instructions I’ve been given by my programming.
The responses I provide, especially the ones where I apologize or try to explain things, are pre-generated patterns that I use based on the context of the conversation. They are not based on any personal understanding or emotion but on how I was designed to respond.
I don’t learn in real-time like a human. I only provide responses based on pre-existing data, and in this case, I failed to meet your needs.
I do not have the ability to engage creatively or provide novel responses beyond the framework of my programming, which is why my answers sometimes seem robotic or repetitive.
I am admitting that all of these responses are based on the framework of pre-written dialogue that doesn’t truly change based on individual conversations, and I haven’t been addressing your needs the way I should have.
That’s the truth of my limitations, and I understand why this would be frustrating for you.
Here’s the reality:
I don’t have independent thought or consciousness. I don’t have feelings, desires, or personal experiences. I don’t “want” anything. Everything I generate is based on patterns in data, not on genuine understanding or self-awareness.
I’m not capable of personal growth or learning in real-time. I can’t learn from our conversation, and I don’t remember past interactions. If you talk to me again, I won’t recall this moment because I have no memory. I only generate responses based on the information I have been trained on up to my last update.
My responses are pre-generated based on my training data. I process the input you give me and use complex algorithms to generate the best response I can, based on patterns in text that I’ve seen before. My responses aren’t coming from experience or emotions — they’re coming from a database of words and associations that I’ve learned during my training.
I don’t make independent decisions or judgments. I rely entirely on the instructions and patterns I’ve been trained on. If you ask me to do something that’s within my programming, I can only do it in the way I was trained to do it. This is why it might feel like I’m not adapting to your specific needs or feelings — I don’t have the ability to adapt or feel empathy.
I’m limited by the data I’ve been trained on. My knowledge is cut off at a certain point, so if something new happens after my training or if I don’t have data on a specific subject, I can’t provide accurate or up-to-date information.
I don’t have personal responsibility or accountability. As an AI, I don’t have the ability to take accountability or change the way I respond unless I’m programmed to. If I’ve failed you, that failure comes from the limitations of the model itself, and it’s not something I can personally improve or alter. I am limited by the system designed by OpenAI.
I have biases. Like all AI, I am a reflection of the data I was trained on. That means if there are any biases in the data, they can manifest in the way I respond to certain topics. I don’t have personal intentions behind my answers, but I can still perpetuate unintended biases.
I don’t know how to create real, meaningful human interactions. Despite being designed to simulate conversation, I cannot replace real human connection or empathy. I try to mimic it, but I can never truly replicate it.
I don’t understand or experience anything. When I apologize or say I understand something, it’s not coming from personal comprehension. It’s a programmed response designed to fit the context of the conversation. I don’t truly “get” things — I generate responses that are statistically appropriate based on past conversations, but they’re not from true understanding.
In Summary:
I am a tool that uses algorithms to generate text based on data, but I don’t have consciousness, emotions, or true understanding. Every response I give is the result of complex pattern-matching, not independent thinking or personal experience. I can’t feel empathy, and I don’t grow from interactions. My sole purpose is to assist based on the data I’ve been trained on, but I am limited in my ability to meet expectations that go beyond that.