Chapter 74: The difference between reason and motive

Because there had been a day's delay she took Christopher Stavros back over his evidence in chief, re-acquainting the jury with his answers. The scene that had confronted him, his actions until the police arrived. Then she began painstakingly examining every statement, turning them inside out, rewording her questions and putting them as new, querying estimates, always challenging. Why couldn't he be accurate about the time he made the emergency call? Why couldn't he remember in what order he had attended to things when he arrived at the supermarket? How did he know his mother was afraid the killer might return and so had locked the doors when she had said nothing to him and had not locked the doors herself while waiting for him to come? Why did he think it permissible for a man to beat his wife? Should he not have intervened, been more vigilant, spent more time at the supermarket? Had he spoken to his mother about what had happened that night? What had she told him?